Skip to Main Content
Project on Government Oversight
 

 

 

 

POGO Slams Decision Not to Investigate Recent Accident at LANL

August 3, 2006 

 

In what is a stunning example of lax federal oversight, the government agency designated to assure the security and safety of the country’s nuclear weapons complex has decided not to investigate a construction accident that occurred June 28 at Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL), the Project On Government Oversight ( POGO ) has learned.

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced its decision in a July 10 memo--eight days after the accident in which two people were seriously injured when a steel stairway fell on them, according to the occurrence report detailing the accident.  In the memo, the NNSA’s Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs tells the agency’s Los Alamos Site Office that the government will not conduct an investigation into the accident.

This is the first documented safety incident since the federal government handed the lab’s management oversight to a private company, Los Alamos National Security (LANS).  Earlier this year, the NNSA announced LANS would identify and correct operational problems and safety issues.  The contractor itself is also allowed to set the safety criteria that NNSA’s Los Alamos Office will use to evaluate the contractor.

“This is a preposterous situation,” said Danielle Brian, POGO ’s executive director. “LANL has had a long list of security and management problems.  Now, the government is giving management responsibility to an outside contractor and letting that contractor set its own grading system.  This is like allowing a student to grade his or her own term paper.”

The NNSA said it reserves the right to conduct an investigation.

Click here to view copies of the July 10 memo and another from NNSA’s Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs.

 


Founded in 1981, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) is a nonpartisan independent watchdog that champions good government reforms. POGO's investigations into corruption, misconduct, and conflicts of interest achieve a more effective, accountable, open, and ethical federal government.

# # #